Peer-city benchmarks
Your city against peer cities, Jan–Sep 2026. Only problems every city tracks, counted the same way and set against each city’s population and staff headcount.
{{ summary }}
Requests per 1,000 residents
Volume is neither good nor bad: more requests can mean more problems, or more people reporting them.
Requests per staff member
Requests divided by the staff each city assigns to this service, so cities of different sizes and staffing compare on the same footing. Peer median: {{ medR }}.
Share closed within a week
Slowest first. Dashed line: median of the peers you picked ({{ medTxt }}). † counts a request closed before the work is done.
Side by side
Staff headcount is the full-time staff each city’s budget assigns to this service. Population is the latest census estimate.
| City | Residents | Staff headcount | Staff per 100,000 residents | Requests | Requests per staff member | Closed within a week |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ r.name }} | {{ r.pop }} | {{ r.hc }} | {{ r.per }} | {{ r.req }} | {{ r.rps }} | {{ r.sh }} |
Cities define “closed” differently
A city that closes a request when a crew is assigned will look faster than one that waits until the work is inspected. Read the share closed alongside each city’s rule.
| City | A request counts as closed when… | Effect on share closed |
|---|---|---|
| {{ d.name }} | {{ d.rule }} | {{ d.eff }} |